To get our original audience feedback back for our rough cut, we had to show our video to the class as a whole, and each person was given a bit of A4 paper on which they wrote the positives; the negatives and points for improvement. The main criticism of our rough cut was that it was too repetitive and this led us to introduce a storyline. However, we did have other criticisms, such as the quality of the lip-syncing between the music and the images. This was a time consuming procedure, but we managed to edit it to perfection for our final cut.
To get the feedback for our final cut, we showed the video to a select group of both A2 Media students and other A2 students. After this, we took them into the side room and filmed their reaction to certain question asked.
This was then edited to allow for an easy understanding of the video.
Untitled from Alex Newcombe on Vimeo.
From our audience feedback, we have learned that the storyline could be improved as we have left a couple of viewers of the video became confused about what happened to the girl, and although this was partially the desired effect as we wished to leave the video on a cliff-hanger, the confusion was in a negative way rather than the attempted positive way which would leave them curious as to what happens, and this would hopefully lead to them wishing to see the next video. However, we were told by the people who would perhaps have a better understanding of the skills and techniques used in filming and editing that it was "difficult to pick some negatives" from our music video. Furthermore, it seems that the overall view of the music video is positive, as the majority of people that viewed it found it to be of a good quality, with it of a similar standard to mainstream music videos.